Home sweet Havana

by Marshall on May 11, 2011

Dear faithful readers, please forgive the brief hiatus from blogging…I bring you a peace offering – economic food for thought!

Owning a home isn’t just an American dream, its a common goal for people around the world. Owning a home is generally a good investment (not always), as it often brings dignity, security, and stability to a family. I’ve spoken with many Esperanza and HOPE loan associates who say one of their ultimate goals is to own a home where all of their children can fit and live comfortably.

But what does it mean to own a home? What does it mean to “own” anything? The bible, of course, teaches that we don’t own anything…we just administer what God has given to us. But what about in a legal sense?

In Cuba, 85% of the population owns their homes. Yet if you live in Cuba, you don’t fully “own” your home – because you don’t have the right to sell it. The Economist reports:

The only legal way to move in Cuba is by swapping residences—a slow, bureaucratic and often corrupt process known as the permuta(“exchange”), which requires finding two roughly similar properties and getting state approval. To avoid this hassle, some Cubans prefer to marry the owner of a property, transfer the deed, and divorce.

The goal of this policy is to limit the gap between rich and poor, towards a world without class differences. No more rich people amassing property at the expense of the poor. To be sure, we’d all prefer more equality. But crippling private property rights destroys economic incentives for gifted builders to construct homes to sell to anyone, rich or poor:

Because there is no incentive to build new homes, Cuba suffers from a dire housing shortage. Many buildings have been repeatedly subdivided. In some families three generations share one bedroom.

This isn’t just an isolated case. Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto (no, not the conquistador) was made famous for linking poverty in Latin America to a lack of full private property rights provided under the legal system.

“In most developing countries, the vast majority of people live outside the legal economy…Because they lack property rights, they cannot access capital or credit, so they cannot grow their businesses. Without a legal framework, the market system fails.” (link)

Rule of law and property rights. Boring stuff but it constitutes the architecture of economic growth. Get it right and you’ll have the privilege of being able take it for granted. Get it wrong, and your left short on houses, food, and opportunity.

{ 0 comments }

A Christian defense free markets

by Marshall on April 13, 2011

If you’ve ever wondered at (or been frustrated by) Christian support of free market economics, free enterprise, and limited goverment…here’s something for your consideration:

Today, RJ Moeller over at the Common Sense Concept Two Cents Blog embarks on an epic journey to honestly explain how he sees his Christian faith informing his socio-economic-political beliefs:

I firmly believe that the Bible affirms free enterprise, entrepreneurial activity, and the de-centralization of power in the hands of fallen men and women.

What follows is my defense of that belief.

Whether you agree or disagree, I encourage you to check it out as it may help explain the theological roots of at least part of today’s political debate in the US and around the globe.

In his first post, RJ deals with Creation, God’s image, and the Cultural Mandate:

As one made in God’s image, I am a walking, talking (albeit limited) expression of His character, creativity, and capabilities.  What does this generally mean?  The lives we live have meaning.  There are better (God-honoring) ways to live our lives.  We are capable of great and imaginative things.

I for one will be following along closely. I encourage you to do the same, too!

{ 0 comments }

The Dignity of Entrepreneurship in Cuba

by Marshall on February 8, 2011

Pop quiz:  Who said the following about entrepreneurship and self-employment?

“It is essential that we change the negative feelings that no small number of us harbor toward this kind of private labor.”

Here’s the grading scale:

  • 1 point if you said Barack Obama. Wrong, but understandable.
  • -5 points if you said Aaron Rogers. Not because he doesn’t know economics. Because he’s a Packer.
  • 10 points (plus a gold star!) for the correct answer…Cuban Communist Dictator Raúl Castro!

After 40 years of prohibition, Cuban private employment is creeping out of the shadows and onto the map, the NY Times reports.

Some interesting facts:

  • 85% of Cubans are employed by the government
  • These workers earning about $20 per month plus free healthcare, education, and an assortment of rationed goods.
  • It is illegal for Carpenters to build anything new, because there is no legal way to buy wood. They can only make repairs.
  • There are now 178 kinds of private jobs that Cuba permits. (This is both remarkable and sad.)
  • By the end of 2010, 75,000 new private businesses received government permits – an increase of 50%.

75,000 is more than a number. It’s 75,000 people, families, neighbors. Doing something new. Being creative. Improving their lives. Providing for their families with dignity. Offering a product or service that their communities value enough to pay them for. Ms. Álvarez is one of the 75,000:

“I feel useful; I’m independent,” said Ms. Álvarez, who opened a small cafe in November at her home in this scruffy town 25 miles from the capital, Havana. “When you sit down at the end of the day and look at how much you have made, you feel satisfied.”

Read the whole article here, and notice how entrepreneurship and hard work brings dignity and hope to those that previously had none. This is why I support economic freedom. This is why I work for HOPE International.

HT to Chris Horst.

{ 4 comments }

Economic Freedom of the Dominican Republic

by Marshall on January 12, 2011

The moment (you didn’t know) you’ve been waiting for has finally arrived! No, not Verizon iPhone…I’m talking about the 2011 Index of Economic Freedom!

Where does USA rank? 9th

What about the Dominican Republic? 90th

Top honors go to Hong Kong, while North Korea is pits.

{ 0 comments }

Swedish professor of international health Hans Rosling plays a convincing supporting role in this brief BBC video. The dyamic star, of course, is the data.

A few observations:

  • There is a significant relationship between what people earn (income) and their standard of living (life expectancy). I’m don’t know much about statistics, but it seems intuitive that higher income would be a major cause of living standard. Not the only cause, but I wouldn’t be surprised if its the biggest.
  • The path of each country is unique. Economies are not machines, they are people making choices. The diversity of people and cultures shows up even in something as impersonal as  macroeconomic statistics.
  • Even the poorest countries have improved substantially over the past 200 years, despite a bigger income disparity. This is something to consider if you view economies as a fixed amount of wealth and opportunity. If I make $5 (or $5 million), does that mean someone else goes without? Hardly. In fact, in the absense of coercion (force or fraud), wealth can only be created by meeting the needs of others.

How do we make this happen? How do we encourage this upward trend? Hans Rosling suggests  “aid, trade, technology, and peace.”

Not a bad start, though somewhat nebulous. Aid:  how should we help? Trade:  what should we trade, and with whom? Technology:  what should we invest in? Peace:  how to we make it happen?

I don’t know. You don’t know. Not even Greenpeace knows. (There’s a shocker). What is certain, though, is that economic liberty is crucial to making this happen. Better outcomes occur when people with the best information have the incentive to make the best decision. Economic liberty (which includes laws that punish coersion) makes this happen.

The Index of Economic Freedom, a product of the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation, helps make this point.

The strong correlation between economic freedom and income.

Freedom seems to be a developing economy’s best friend. Do you agree? What else is important? Any other cool examples of communicating large amounts of data?

HT to “Big Daddy T”. You can also watch more of Prof Rosling’s magic on TED talk tv.

{ 1 comment }

Greed, Charity, and the role of Government

by Marshall on October 29, 2010

George Mason University economist Don Boudreaux explains to the NYTimes why those who oppose government  programs are not necessarily greedy Scrooges:

There’s a long tradition of classical liberalism – boasting names such as Adam Smith, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Madison, Jefferson, Tocqueville, Macaulay, Gladstone, Cobden, Mencken, and Hayek – based on the understanding that forced “charity” is not generosity; that no agency better serves the narrow and anti-social goals of the truly greedy than does the state; and that individuals left to regulate their own affairs with a minimum of interference from government will create extensive and deep patterns of social cooperation that are far more effective at meeting human needs than will any bureaucracy or program imposed by the state.

In case that’s a little too technical, “deep patterns of social cooperation” = economies that provide goods and services that people want; neighborhood associations; churches, synagogues, & mosques; and non-profits organizations (like HOPE International) that rely on private donations.

This means that opposing government-provided social services (education/healthcare/jobs/etc.) isn’t heartless. For the great minds listed above, it was precisely their concern for their fellow man that led them to promote a more limited government.

{ 0 comments }

The Cuban Special Period – What’s for lunch?

by Marshall on October 21, 2010

Sugar water.

According to Andrés, a Cuban coworker of mine, from roughly 1991-94 his lunch every day was water with sugar. That’s it. “I was was so skinny you could see my bones,” he says with a big grin and a deep laugh.

This was during Cuba’s “Special Period in Time of Peace,” a severe economic crisis triggered by the fall of the Soviet Union and caused by decades of unsustainable economic policy. The innocuous name was courtesy of Castro, an example of his powerful rhetoric and a glimpse into his power-hungry soul.

It’s interesting to see how the principles of Cuba’s centralized economic planning contrast with the principles on which HOPE and Esperanza have built their microfinance operations. Collective ownership vs. individual responsibility. Top-down direction vs. bottom-up innovation. When people are treated as though they are valuable and capable creations, given freedom and responsibility within a framework of general laws and norms (instead of handouts and arbitrary commands) they tend to experience both material and personal growth.

This principled liberty helps turn sugar water into a hearty meal. And it empowers the helpless to become helpers.

{ 1 comment }